1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 565 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mazda R 360 | 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | R 360 | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2350 mm |
