1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 5,439 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (494 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 478 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 1649 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (800 Nm) has 778 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mazda R 360 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | R 360 | CL |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 5439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 494 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 800 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 87 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 2029 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 88 L |
