1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mazda R 360 | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | R 360 | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 2298 cc |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
