1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2006 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2006 Opel Meriva is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,685 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mazda R 360 | 2006 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | R 360 | Meriva |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 1685 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |