1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 366 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 508 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mazda R 360 | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | R 360 | CLK |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 5461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 382 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 530 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 62 L |