1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,433 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 1121 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mazda R 360 | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | R 360 | S60 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 2433 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 22 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 90 mm |
Top Speed | 80 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |