1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2011 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2011 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mazda R 360 | 2011 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | R 360 | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |