1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 1229 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (240 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mazda R 360 | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | R 360 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 67 L |
