1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox

To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1357 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Mazda R 360 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
Make Mazda Chevrolet
Model R 360 Equinox
Year Released 1960 2013
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Size 355 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 16 HP 180 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 22 Nm 233 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 60 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 63 mm 98 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 380 kg 1737 kg
Vehicle Length 2990 mm 4771 mm
Vehicle Width 1300 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 1770 mm 2857 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 71 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]