1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1357 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mazda R 360 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | R 360 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 98 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1737 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 71 L |