1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1964 Toyota Corona is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Corona. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 960 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Corona |
Year Released | 1960 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 61 L |