1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 5,956 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL (375 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 120 kg more than 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 300 | SL |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 5956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 80 L |