1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Subaru |
Model | 300 | R2 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 30 L |