1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 520 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | 300 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2957 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 60 L |
