1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Smart |
| Model | 300 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 2700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 1870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 33 L |
