1960 MG Magnett vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1960 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1960 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 135 kg more than 1960 MG Magnett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 MG Magnett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG Magnett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.

Compare all specifications: