1960 MG Magnett vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 311 kg more than 1960 MG Magnett.
Because 1960 MG Magnett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG Magnett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 MG Magnett | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | MG | Volvo |
Model | Magnett | C30 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2639 mm |