1960 MG MGA vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG MGA would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1960 MG MGA. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1960 MG MGA.
Because 1960 MG MGA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG MGA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 MG MGA | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | MG | Peugeot |
Model | MGA | RCZ |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 157 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 16 seconds | 7.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1359 mm |