1960 MG MGA vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG MGA would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 485 kg more than 1960 MG MGA.
Because 1960 MG MGA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG MGA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG MGA. (104 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG MGA.
Compare all specifications:
1960 MG MGA | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | MG | Mini |
Model | MGA | Countryman |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2595 mm |