1960 Mini MK I vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1962 Nissan Cedric is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 315 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1962 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mini MK I | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mini | Nissan |
| Model | MK I | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2540 mm |
