1960 Mitsubishi A10 vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A3 (104 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1960 Mitsubishi A10. (20 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mitsubishi A10.
Because 1960 Mitsubishi A10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mitsubishi A10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mitsubishi A10 | 2011 Audi A3 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
Model | A10 | A3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 493 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |