1960 Moretti 1200 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Moretti 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Moretti 1200 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (97 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1960 Moretti 1200. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 Moretti 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 1960 Moretti 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Moretti 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Moretti 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Moretti 1200 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Moretti | Renault |
Model | 1200 | Clio |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1204 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 97 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2590 mm |