1960 Morgan 4 vs. 2005 Renault Clio

To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1960 Morgan 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 375 kg more than 1960 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Morgan 4. (72 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Morgan 4.

Compare all specifications: