1960 Morris Minor vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1960 Morris Minor is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1960 Morris Minor. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1960 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1068 kg more than 1960 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Morris Minor | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Morris | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Minor | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 6.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 792 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 3690 mm |
