1960 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,170 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 70 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (84 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Nissan Bluebird | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Bluebird | Clio |
Year Released | 1960 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |