1960 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Bluebird | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Bluebird | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 988 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |
