1960 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (84 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Bluebird | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 988 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
