1960 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chrysler 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler 300 (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (84 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Nissan | Chrysler |
Model | Bluebird | 300 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3048 mm |