1960 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Volvo S60
To start off, 2011 Volvo S60 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo S60 weights approximately 684 kg more than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (84 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | S60 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 84 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2776 mm |