1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 1998 Rover 75 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 75 (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 1998 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Cedric | 75 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
