1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Musso is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Musso (316 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2000 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Nissan | SsangYong |
| Model | Cedric | Musso |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
