1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo V40 (108 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo V40 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Cedric | V40 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2570 mm |
