1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2004 TVR T 350
To start off, 2004 TVR T 350 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,605 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 TVR T 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 TVR T 350 (346 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 TVR T 350 (393 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 TVR T 350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2004 TVR T 350 | |
| Make | Nissan | TVR |
| Model | Cedric | T 350 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 346 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2370 mm |
