1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2008 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota RAV4 (269 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota RAV4 (335 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota RAV4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3546 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2670 mm |