1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Challenger (569 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Nissan | Dodge |
| Model | Cedric | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 6100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5022 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1923 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2946 mm |
