1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Lancia Musa
To start off, 2010 Lancia Musa is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lancia Musa (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lancia Musa should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Nissan Cedric (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lancia Musa. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1960 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lancia Musa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Lancia Musa | |
| Make | Nissan | Lancia |
| Model | Cedric | Musa |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1368 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2520 mm |
