1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Cedric | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2875 mm |
