1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Cedric | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3010 mm |