1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Cedric | CTS |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2880 mm |