1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Nissan | Dodge |
| Model | Cedric | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6350 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3052 mm |
