1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Tundra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 6290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1925 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 4180 mm |