1960 NSU Sport vs. 1996 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Swift is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 NSU Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 NSU Sport would be higher. At 993 cc (3 cylinders), 1996 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Suzuki Swift (55 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1960 NSU Sport. (30 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1960 NSU Sport. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 164 kg more than 1960 NSU Sport. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 NSU Sport is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 NSU Sport. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 NSU Sport | 1996 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | NSU | Suzuki |
Model | Sport | Swift |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 583 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 516 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2270 mm |