1960 Peugeot 203 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Peugeot 203 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Clio weights approximately 10 kg more than 1960 Peugeot 203.
Because 1960 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Peugeot 203 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Peugeot | Renault |
| Model | 203 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |
