1960 Porsche 356 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1960 Porsche 356.
Because 1960 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Porsche 356 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Porsche | Volvo |
Model | 356 | C30 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 786 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 60 L |