1960 Porsche 356 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Porsche 356 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Porsche 356 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Porsche 356 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Porsche | Smart |
| Model | 356 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 33 L |
