1960 Renault Juva vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 845 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Renault Juva is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Renault Juva | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Renault | Subaru |
Model | Juva | R2 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 30 L |