1960 Renault Juva vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1960 Renault Juva.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Renault Juva | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Juva | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 100 L |
