1960 Renault Juva vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 565 kg more than 1960 Renault Juva.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Renault Juva | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Juva | Matrix |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |