1960 Renault Juva vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura CSX weights approximately 533 kg more than 1960 Renault Juva.
Because 1960 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Renault Juva | 2010 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Renault | Acura |
| Model | Juva | CSX |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |
