1960 Renault Juva vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 603 kg more than 1960 Renault Juva.
Because 1960 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Renault Juva | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Juva | 3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |