1960 Renault Juva vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1216 kg more than 1960 Renault Juva.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Renault Juva | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Juva | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 87 L |